le 26/03/2008 à 16:29 |
Contenu illicite ?
@ fred.2kn
rapel moi sur quel prod ou quel real j'ai jeter des pierres...
|
> Breizham
quand tu dis :
je ne dit pas que la qualite du x est mediocre (y a du mediocre & y a du bon) je trouve juste que certaines scenes de sexe sont mal filmees,( = jettage de pierres!!!) mal faites(=jettage de pierres!!) et je trouve aussi que niveau scenarios y'a encore neaucoup de choses a faire ( = jettage de pierres!!) (voila pourquoi je pense q'il y a des choses a ameliorer)
|
Encore une fois, tu sous estimes le boulot meme si t'as raison et que c'est mal filme et surtout quand il y a bonbon qui est depense en montage, lumiere, filmage............mais meme dans ce cas je te promet c'est tres difficille de filmer ces putains d'ebats sexuels!!!!!!
j'ai pas fouiner jusqua savoir si tas balance un nom de prod/real ( t'as du quand meme titiller du dorcel/bodilis ou de la prod ricaine dans un coin du forum
je balance un petit post d'eli cross au sujet de la qualite des production et si les gens s'en batt les couilles ou non..??............
eh bien beaucoup de fabricants de porn s'en BATT ENCORE LES COUILLES!!!.......
SORRYY.......
Do you think the quality of porn has gone up or...
ELI CROSS says :
Wow... There's so much I'd like to say in here on this topic I could spend the next week typing. But who'd want to read it?
At this moment, creatively, and as a whole, I don't think this industry has a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of. I'm really proud of a few of my shows -- Upload and Corruption in particular -- but I've made a lot of crap as well.
I think a lot of the points bigfoot makes are close to being right, although some of it just doesn't jibe with my experience of being in the industry for nearly two decades.
The fact is that most people in this industry have no interest or desire in putting effort into their product, and this includes many of the company owners. When I ran AVN, Steve Hirsch (Vivid's owner) once told me with pride, "I have never seen a Vivid movie all the way through."
How the hell can you care about your product when you don't even watch it?
And he's not alone. One of the things I love about SexZ is that Bo -- the owner -- watches everything we produce. He's the only company owner I've ever met who does that.
As for the quality of the directors, I've said it many times that the only qualifications you need to direct porn are a camcorder and a thumb. That has led to a vast culture of "I don't give a fuck" in the industry. I get so much shit from other pornographers for the effort we put into our big shows.
Y'see, in the industry, it isn't cool to care too much about what you're making. It isn't cool to get turned on by a scene when you're shooting it or try too hard on a movie. That's what makes Jake Malone's stuff pop -- he's a genuine pervert shooting the stuff that turns him on.
Just a few days ago, I had a performer on set -- one of the absolute best in the business -- and he was watching a scene from Upload over Derrick Pierce's shoulder. We got to talking and I told him about the budget, the 20-day shoot, the months of prep, the months of editing, blah, blah, blah.
He looked at me when I was done and simply said, "Why on Earth would you do that for a porn movie? I could make fifteen movies for that money?"
This is a guy I like and respect, but it came crashing down on me -- as it so often does -- that porn isn't art. It's commerce.
Another huge part of the problem is that the production companies are dying because so many of them have made horrible deals essentially giving away their product on the web. But that's a topic for another day.
In closing, I want to address two final points. The first is about your dreams of contract girls and crossovers. As a guy who has shot dozens of contract girls in my time including many mentioned here, let me burst your bubbles a bit: with very, very few exceptions, contract girls are the absolute antithesis of good porn.
Almost to a one (as noted above, almost), contract girls are surly, ill-tempered, don't want to be there, don't want to do anything, don't care about of the quality of the product they are in, despise doing sex scenes, arrive with a list of "I don't do that"s longer than the script, and care only about how soon they can go home.
I wish this was not an essential truth of this business. But it is. And no truthful director working today could or would ever deny it.
The last -- and related point -- is the complaint about directors using the same talent over and over again. I'm definitely guilty of this. I have a repertory company of people I use time and time again because they're dependable. Until you've been in this business you really can't imagine how flaky, unprofessional and downright irritating a lot of the talent can be. It's mind-boggling. Then again, what can you expect when you give a nineteen-year-old $20k a month and say "be your own boss."
Out of respect for this desire to see new people I try to put at least two talent I've never shot in every show I direct. Fully two-thirds of them either A: cancel for one reason or another (as happened with Claudia Downs on my last shoot, though through no fault of her own whatsoever, and I'm looking forward to shooting her sometime) to get replaced with one of my regulars (I ended up replacing Claudia with Trinity Post), or B: they go on the Never Hire Again list for some egregious bad behavior or lousy performance.
Okay, you see what I mean? I could go on like this for days. Someone stop him.
You folks make a lot of good points, and I'm gonna go before I try to address the rest of them, fer chrissakes.